tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8412586.post4060785350480955220..comments2023-10-31T10:46:39.541-04:00Comments on Look who's talking...: Redactedanuraghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03178119895116619951noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8412586.post-67191726991384330792007-11-21T18:52:00.000-04:002007-11-21T18:52:00.000-04:00Snake Eyes, like many other films, is usually dism...Snake Eyes, like many other films, is usually dismissed for stupid (and wrong) reasons like Nicolas Cage or being too-stylish or over the top, which are paradoxically its merits. De Palma uses (and even mocks) Cage's over enthusiasm. :)<BR/><BR/>It was redacted version. The images are not removed but their faces covered with black bars.anuraghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03178119895116619951noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8412586.post-19320787299651604302007-11-21T11:27:00.000-04:002007-11-21T11:27:00.000-04:00I haven't seen it yet but I was a little amused to...I haven't seen it yet but I was a little amused to read your comments about Snake Eyes. I never once thought about those things while watching... but that was very long ago. I am also not as familiar with De Palma's oeuvre as you are.<BR/><BR/>Did you see the un-"redacted" version of the film. I was reading that the producers removed the real Iraq images from the film and de Palma was very angry about it. Don't know what version finally came in the theatres.Alokhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12947383354732747209noreply@blogger.com